Athletic Training at Iowa
 

education program
about our program
ats news
current events
ats services
services and locations
calendar of events
program events
conference presentations
conference topics
sports medicine symposium
symposium details


  announcements
alumni newsletter

OSHA training

staff openings


  Taping vs Bracing

Taping vs Bracing

Dan Foster, ATC; Jennie Hartgrave, ATC; Graduate Students

October 9, 2003

Objectives for Conference

l   risk factors in ankle sprain injury

l   consensus use of taping and bracing

l   literature about effectiveness

Ankle Sprains

l   What is your experience about the frequency of ankle sprains in sports?

 

l   What sports are at most risk?

Ankle Sprains - Frequency

l    Most common injury

l    High School

l    College

l    U Iowa

 

l    Other high frequency sites: upper thigh, knee, shoulder (NCAA)

l    Garrick 1997 AJSM

l    10-38% 1995-7 NATA

l    8-28% 1984-03 NCAA

l    0-47% 8/02-5/03 in 448 participants

Sports at Most Risk for Ankle Injury

l    WBB (47%)

l    WVB (43%)

l    FB (32%)

l    MBB (32%)

 

l    Other Colleges

l    MBB (28%)

l    WBB (26%)

l    VB (23%)

Sports at Most Risk

l    Jump & land on one foot

l    Sharp cutting maneuvers

l    BB, FB, SC, VB

(Garrick & Requa Clin Pediatr 1989)

Predictive Factors

l   Do we know what predictive factors place athletes at most risk of ankle sprains?

Predictive Factors

l    Previous sprain

l    Gender

l    Height/weight

l    Limb dominance

l    Anatomic foot type & size

l    Generalized laxity, alignment, ROM

l    Strength

l    Muscle reaction time

l    Postural sway

Cordova M, et al. JAT; 2002

l    Shoe type

l    Duration and intensity

l    Player position

l    Bracing and taping

 

 

 

 

 

Benyon B, et al.  J Orthop Res; 2002

 

Injury Prevention

 

 

l   What has been done to prevent these frequent injuries?

What has been and should be done to prevent these frequent injuries?

l    Better shoes

l    Alter surfaces

l    Revise rules

l    Improve playing fields

l    Instruction by coaches

l    Strength and proprioceptive training

l    Taping and bracing

Taping and Bracing

l   When would you use one strategy over the other or combine them?

 

l   Are there any contra-indications to using them?

 

Taping vs Bracing

l   How effective is taping or bracing in preventing or treating common ankle injuries?

Literature Review

l    1966-2000

l    No papers without primary data

l    No treatment only papers

l    621 citations initially

l    113 screened

l    10 compared alternative methods to prevent ankle sprains, 14 randomized trials

l    Thacker SB, et al.  Am J Sports Med; 1999 (CDC)

l    Handoll HH, et al.  Cochrane Database Syst rev; 2001.

Literature Review

Methods

l    8279 participants

l    12 trials involved young adults, participating in organized, high-risk activities – other 2 were injured patients

 

l    Used external ankle supports

    Semi-rigid orthosis

    Air-cast brace

    High top shoes

    Taping

l    Other factors investigated

    Ankle disc training

    Muscle stretching

    Health education

    Controlled rehab

Literature Review

Results – Cochrane Rev

l    Reduced rate when using external ankle support (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.69)

    Greater effect for people with prior Hx

    Still effective for people w/ no Hx

    No change in incidence for other leg

l    All other factors were limited in interpretation including taping

 

l    Conclusion:  good evidence for benefit from semi-rigid orthoses or air-cast to prevent ankle sprains

Literature Review

Results - CDC

l    Taping has a protective effect

l    Taping not as effective as orthoses

l    Specific training reduces injury rate

Conclusion:  athletes should undergo appropriate rehabilitation with specific proprioceptive training and wear external orthoses for at least 6 mo

Conclusions

University of Iowa © 2004,  All Rights Reserved..