|
|
|
|
|
Taping vs Bracing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taping vs Bracing
Dan Foster, ATC;
Jennie Hartgrave, ATC; Graduate Students
October 9, 2003
Objectives for
Conference
l
risk factors in ankle sprain injury
l
consensus use of taping and bracing
l
literature about effectiveness
Ankle Sprains
l
What is your experience about the frequency of ankle sprains in
sports?
l
What sports are at most risk?
Ankle Sprains -
Frequency
l
Most common injury
l
High School
l
College
l
U Iowa
l
Other high frequency sites: upper thigh, knee, shoulder (NCAA)
l
Garrick 1997 AJSM
l
10-38% 1995-7 NATA
l
8-28% 1984-03 NCAA
l
0-47% 8/02-5/03 in 448 participants
Sports at Most Risk
for Ankle Injury
l
WBB (47%)
l
WVB (43%)
l
FB (32%)
l
MBB (32%)
l
Other Colleges
l
MBB (28%)
l
WBB (26%)
l
VB (23%)
Sports at Most Risk
l
Jump & land on one foot
l
Sharp cutting maneuvers
l
BB, FB, SC, VB
(Garrick & Requa
Clin Pediatr
1989)
Predictive Factors
l
Do we know what predictive factors place athletes at most risk of
ankle sprains?
Predictive Factors
l
Previous sprain
l
Gender
l
Height/weight
l
Limb dominance
l
Anatomic foot type & size
l
Generalized laxity, alignment, ROM
l
Strength
l
Muscle reaction time
l
Postural sway
Cordova M, et al.
JAT;
2002
l
Shoe type
l
Duration and intensity
l
Player position
l
Bracing and taping
Benyon B, et al.
J Orthop Res;
2002
Injury Prevention
l
What has been done to prevent these frequent injuries?
What has been and
should be done to prevent these frequent injuries?
l
Better shoes
l
Alter surfaces
l
Revise rules
l
Improve playing fields
l
Instruction by coaches
l
Strength and proprioceptive training
l
Taping and bracing
Taping and Bracing
l
When would you use one strategy over the other or combine them?
l
Are there any contra-indications to using them?
Taping vs Bracing
l
How effective is taping or bracing in preventing or treating
common ankle injuries?
Literature Review
l
1966-2000
l
No papers without primary data
l
No treatment only papers
l
621 citations initially
l
113 screened
l
10 compared alternative methods to prevent ankle sprains, 14
randomized trials
l
Thacker SB, et al.
Am J Sports Med;
1999 (CDC)
l
Handoll HH, et al.
Cochrane Database Syst
rev; 2001.
Literature Review
Methods
l
8279 participants
l
12 trials involved young adults, participating in organized,
high-risk activities – other 2 were injured patients
l
Used external ankle supports
–
Semi-rigid orthosis
–
Air-cast brace
–
High top shoes
–
Taping
l
Other factors investigated
–
Ankle disc training
–
Muscle stretching
–
Health education
–
Controlled rehab
Literature Review
Results – Cochrane Rev
l
Reduced rate when using external ankle support (RR 0.53, 95% CI
0.40-0.69)
–
Greater effect for people with prior Hx
–
Still effective for people w/ no Hx
–
No change in incidence for other leg
l
All other factors were limited in interpretation including taping
l
Conclusion: good evidence for benefit from semi-rigid orthoses
or air-cast to prevent ankle sprains
Literature Review
Results - CDC
l
Taping has a protective effect
l
Taping not as effective as orthoses
l
Specific training reduces injury rate
Conclusion: athletes should undergo
appropriate rehabilitation with specific proprioceptive training and
wear external orthoses for at least 6 mo
Conclusions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|