Leading Change: The Science and Art of
Leadership in the Changing Organization
Todd Darnold
What is leadership?
Leaders, Made or Born?
Leadership Theory and Evidence
Leading Change
Business Research versus Medical Research
Leadership
Leadership is a process whereby an individual influences others to
achieve a common goal.
Leadership is ultimately about creating a way for people to contribute to
making something extraordinary happen.
~Alan Keith, Lucas Digital
Leadership
Leadership Theories
Trait theories of leadership - Theories that sought personality, social,
physical, or intellectual traits that differentiated leaders from nonleaders.
A recent meta-analysis has shown that emotional stability, extraversion,
openness to experience, and conscientiousness are all positively related to
leadership.
A recent meta-analysis has shown that intelligence is positively related
to leadership.
Leadership Theories
Behavioral theories - Specific behaviors differentiate leaders from
nonleaders.
Initiating structure vs. consideration
Production-oriented vs. employee-oriented
Can Transformational Leadership Be Learned?
Study of Bank Managers
Effects of Transformational Leadership
Training
Subordinate Job Performance
Leadership Theories
Fiedler contingency model - Effective groups depend upon a proper match
between a leaders style of interacting with subordinates and the degree to
which the situation gives control and influence to the leader.
Situation is defined based on leader-member relations, task structure,
and position power.
Two Basic Forms of Leadership
Transactional leadership
Reinforce followers for successful
completion of their end of the bargain (contingent reward)
Transformational leadership
Motivate followers to work for
transcendental goals that go beyond immediate self-interests
Transformational leaders
Are charismatic
Present a positive, appealing
vision of the future
Are seen as agents of change and
innovation
Encourage and support followers
Charismatic, Transformational, and Visionary
Leadership
Charismatic leadership - Followers
make attributions of heroic or extraordinary leadership abilities when they
observe certain behaviors.
Visionary leadership - The ability
to create and articulate a realistic, credible, attractive vision of the future
that grows out of and improves upon the present.
Transformational leadership theory
is the broadest - it incorporates elements of the other two.
Four Dimensions:
Transformational
Idealized influence
serving as charismatic role model to followers
Inspirational
motivation
articulation of clear, appealing, and inspiring vision to followers
Intellectual
stimulation
stimulating creativity by questioning assumptions and challenging status
quo
Individualized
consideration
attending to individual needs of followers
Four Dimensions:
Transactional
Contingent reward
Exchanging resources for follower support
Management by
exception-active
monitoring performance/taking corrective action
Management by
exception-passive
intervening only when problem becomes serious
Laissez faire
avoiding leadership responsibilities
The Additive Effect of Transformational Leadership
Research Supporting Transformational
Leadership
Widespread Support for Transformational Leadership
Global support
Evidence supporting the theory
found in Australia, New Zealand, China, Japan, France, Germany, Italy,
Netherlands, Canada, Mexico, USA, Egypt, Israel, South Africa, Venezuela and
others
Occupational support
School principals, marine
commanders, entrepreneurs, ministers, middle managers, CEOs, union shop stewards
and more
Level support
No significant differences have
been found in the effects of transformational leadership across levels of
leaders.
Ethical vs. Unethical
Charismatic Leaders
Unethical (personalized)
Uses power only for personal gain
or impact
Promotes own personal vision
Censures critical or opposing views
Demands own decisions be accepted
without question
One-way communication
Insensitive to followers needs
Relies on convenient external model
standards to satisfy self-interests
Ethical (socialized)
Uses power to serve others
Aligns vision with followers needs
and aspirations
Considers and learns from criticism
Stimulates followers to think
independently and to question the leaders view
Open, two-way communication
Coaches, develops, and supports
followers; shares recognition with others
Relies on internal moral standards
to satisfy organizational and societal interests
Characteristics of
Empowered Employees
Self-efficacy
- The person has high confidence about his or her capability to perform
activities with skill.
Self-determination
- The person has the capability to determine how and when the work is done.
Impact
- The person believes it is possible to have a
significant impact on the job and work environment.
Meaning
- The person values the purpose or goals of the activity in which they are
engaged.
What are the biggest barriers to change?
Resistance to Change:
Individual Factors
Resistance to Change:
Organizational Factors
Establishing a Sense of Urgency
What works:
Showing a need for change using
dramatic stories, data and examples from outside the organization.
Never underestimating how much
complacency and fear constrains peoples actions.
What doesnt:
Relying solely on rational
business cases, seeking upper level approval before moving, or racing ahead
before recognizing peoples resistance.
Believing that you have to be
sinking before you can build a strong case for change.
Building the Guiding Team
What works:
Showing enthusiasm and commitment
to attract the right people to the team.
Structuring meetings to minimize
frustration and increase trust among members.
What doesnt:
Trying to lead change with weak
task forces of volunteers, single individuals, or fragmented teams.
Avoiding confrontation with top
people who dont endorse the change effort.
Getting the Vision Right
What works:
Developing a 1-2 sentence
description of the vision.
Focus on people and services.
Pay attention to strategies that
will make it a reality.
What doesnt:
Overly analytic, financial based
vision exercises.
Focus on slashing costs or raising
profits.
Relying solely on logic to
convince people how they can do more.
Communicating for Buy-In
What works:
Keep it simple and repeat it
often.
Understand the audience, and their
resistance.
Directly addressing anxiety, fear,
& confusion.
What doesnt:
Speaking only to convey new
information.
Contradicting words with actions.
Overwhelming people with junk
messages that hide the important issues.
Empowering Action
What works:
Finding credible examples of
people with change experience to increase peoples confidence.
Recognition and reward systems
that inspire and promote self-confidence.
Providing feedback (positive &
negative).
What doesnt:
Ignoring bosses who dont empower,
or giving their power to their subordinates.
Trying to remove all barriers at
once.
Creating Short-Term Wins
What works:
Early wins that are highly
visible.
Wins that are emotionally
meaningful to people.
Wins that benefit other powerful
people, not yet on your team.
What doesnt:
Trying for too many small wins at
once.
Taking too long.
Stretching the truth about
accomplishments or creating wins with all the best people.
Not Letting Up
What works:
Removing tasks that soak up time,
but are no longer relevant.
Keeping up urgency.
Walking the talk and showing
success.
What doesnt:
Developing rigid long-term plans.
Sacrificing so much that you burn
out yourself and others.
Avoiding confrontation with
existing systems.
Making Change Stick
What works:
Using new employee orientation to
reinforce what the organization cares about.
Using promotions and rewards to
visibly demonstrate new norms.
Telling vivid success stories
about the change.
What doesnt:
Thinking that rewards can take the
place of culture.
Trying to start, rather than end,
with culture.
Differences in Research
Grants ???
Conflicts of interest ???