Adhesive Capsulitis

Bryce Bederka, MD

Sports Medicine Conference

January 19, 2007

Case #1

n    MD 50 y/o woman

n    4-5 month history of increasing discomfort in the Right shoulder, acutely worse over past 2-3 weeks, necessitating ER visit

n    Constant pain, increases with use, unable to sleep

n    No history of acute or remote trauma

n    Seen another orthopod who performed subacromial injection without relief

Case #1

n    Medical history of acid reflux, on Cimetidine

q    Denies other significant, only taking T3 for pain

n    ROM at presentation

n      Elev 70

n      Abd 50

n      ER 0

n      IR ‘limited’

n    Given Vicodin Rx, refused NSAIDs, started on PT program for ROM

Case #1

n    At 6 weeks, 3 mos, 5 mos, pain significantly improved

q    ROM

n      Flex 100

n      Abd 70

n      ER 0/70 20/0

n      IR 0/70 buttock/0

Case 1

Case #2

n    CG, 50 y/o woman

n    Had Right shoulder arthroscopy 4/04 with SA decompression, distal claviculectomy, rotator cuff repair

q    ROM under anesthesia

n      Elev 160

n      Abd 130

n      ER 0/90 60/60

n      IR 0/90 60/60

Case #2

n    3 months post-op, limited ROM

n      Elev 90

n      Abd 60

n      ER 10-15

n      IR to buttock

n    Subacromial injection improved pain temporarily, but no change in ROM

n    No improvement with continued therapy, Celebrex, at 5mos, 6mos, 8mos, 10mos

Adhesive Capsulitis

n    Primary

q    Idiopathic

n    Secondary

q    Post-traumatic

q    Post-surgical

q    Post-immobilization

Etiology

n     Exact cause is unknown

q     Autoimmune

q     Inflammatory

q     Endocrine

n     Often no known trauma, or unusual response based on condition

n     More common in:

q     DM

q     Neurologic diseases

q     HIV – antiretroviral therapy

q     Cancer – breast

q     Thyroid disorders

Epidemiology

n    Will affect 1 in 50 adults

n    Most common from 40-60 years of age

n    70% women

n    Usually non-dominant shoulder

n    1 in 5 will develop symptoms in the contralateral shoulder

Course

n     Phase 1 – Freezing or Painful

q     Painful with any motion

q     Motion deteriorates

q     2-8 months

n     Phase 2 – Frozen or Stiff

q     Pain diminishes, at limits of motion

q     Motion loss persistent

q     4-12 months

n     Phase 3 – Thawing or Recovery

q     Pain diminishes

q     Motion improves

q     5-24 months

Natural History

n    Primary adhesive capsulitis has a self-limited course

q    Spontaneous resolution can be expected over 1-3 years

q    Some limitations of motion will be persistent in up to 60% of patients

n    Secondary adhesive capsulitis may be more difficult to treat with therapy

Anatomy

n    Shoulder joint is an inherently loose articulation

n    Stability primarily maintained by the rotator cuff musculature

q    Compresses G-H joint

n    Capsule and glenohumeral ligaments are normally lax through most arcs of motion

q    Act at extremes of motion to constrain against excessive movement

Pathoanatomy

n     Capsule

q     Involved with primary adhesive capsulitis

n     Scarring of specific structures

q     Following stabilization procedures

n     Tissue planes

q     Involved post-fracture or immobilization

Assessment

n     History

q     Trauma / inciting event

q     Medical conditions

q     Duration of symptoms

n     Physical

q     Active and passive motion

q     Strength

n     Radiographs

q     Arthrography

q     MRI and CT

Patterns of Motion Loss

n    External rotation of adducted shoulder

q    Anterosuperior capsular contracture and rotator interval

n    External rotation of abducted shoulder

q    Anteroinferior capsule

n    Internal rotation, cross-body adduction

q    Posterior capsule

Treatment Options

n     Observation

n     Medication

q     NSAID

q     Steroid

n     Injection

q     Intra-articular

q     Subacromial

q     Distention arthrography

n     Therapy

n     Manipulation under anesthesia

n     Arthroscopic release

q     Capsule

q     Subdeltoid

n     Open release

Observation

n    Gradual resolution of pain over several months

n    Gradual improvement of motion

n    May not achieve full return of motion

n    May take 1-3 years for resolution of symptoms

Medication

n     NSAIDs often prescribed, but no studies to validate their efficacy

n     Buchbinder, Ann Rheum Dis, 2004

q     Randomized, placebo trial of prednisone

q     3 week course of 30mg prednisone daily

q     Improvements in pain, disability (DASH), SF-36 at 3 weeks

q     Not maintained at 6 weeks or longer

n     Cochrane Database, 2006

q     Oral steroids effective up to 6 weeks, but no sustained benefit

Injection

n      Arslan, Rheumatolog Int, 2001

q     20 patients

q     Injection of 40mg methylprednisolone (no PT) vs PT with NSAID

q     Both groups improved similarly over 12 weeks

n      Ryans, Rheumatology, 2005

q     80 patients

q     3 groups

n      20mg triamcinolone and PT

n      20mg triamcinolone alone

n      PT and placebo injection

q     6 weeks, triamcinolone groups had less pain and disability, PT groups had better motion

q     16 weeks, all groups improved equally

Injection

n     Carette, Arthritis Rheum, 2003

q     93 patients

q     Randomized to 4 groups

n      Injection with 40mg triamcinolone vs placebo

n      Supervised PT vs no PT (all had home program)

q     Steroid injections provided improvement at 6 weeks

q     Therapy provided greater earlier gains in motion

q     All groups equal at 12 months

n     Cochrane Database, 2003

q     Short-term gains, but no long-term benefit

q     Need larger studies with sound methodology

Distention arthrography

n     LaRoche, Rev Rheum, 1998

q     40 patients

q     Distention arthrography with corticosteroids, followed by aggressive PT

q     Significant gains at 5 weeks, maintained at 1 month

q     No controls, short f/u

n     Poitte, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2004

q     15 patients

q     Serial distention arthrograms with steroid at 3 week intervals, x3

q       Improvements after 1st and 2nd injections, not after 3rd

q     No control group, short f/u

Physical Therapy

n    Griggs, JBJS-A, 2000

q    71 patients with Stage 2 disease

q    Taught stretching-exercise program

q    Assessed on pain, ROM, function, DASH, SF-36

q    12+ months f/u

q    64 satisfied with results, 7 unsatisfied including 5 who had surgery

q    Most had residual limitations of motion, but did not affect function

q    No non-intervention group

Physical Therapy

n     Pajareya, J Med Assoc Thai, 2004

q     121 patients

q     Randomised to NSAID alone, or with PT, for 3 weeks

q     PT and NSAID sig better at 3 weeks

q     No difference at 12 weeks

n     Vermeulen, Phys Ther, 2006

q     Comparison of high-grade vs low-grade mobilization techniques

q     Both groups demonstrated improvements over 12 months

q     HGMT had significant improvement in motion parameters at 12 months as compared to LGMT

Manipulation Under Ansethesia

n      Kivimaki, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2001

q     24 patients

q     Randomized to manipulation alone or manipulation with intra-articular corticosteroid

q     Both groups improved for pain and ROM at post-op visit

q     No difference between groups

n      Loew, JSES, 2005

q     Arthroscopy following 30 manipulations

q     All demonstrated some degree of synovitis

q     All had capsular rupture

n      18 had no additional lesions

n      4 SLAP

n      3 partial subscapularis tears

n      4 anterior labral detachments

n      2 MGHL tears

Arthroscopic Release

n     Jerosch, KSSTA, 2001

q     28 patients who had failed 6 months therapy

q     At 6 weeks post-op, all ROM and Constant scores were improved significantly

q     No control group, short f/u

n     Holloway, JBJS-A, 2001

q     50 patients with idiopathic, post-surgical, or post-fracture adhesive capsulitis

q     At mean 20 months, all patients had improvement in ROM, pain, and function scores

q     Post-surgical adhesive capsulitis patients had slightly less improvement

Arthroscopic Release

n    Berghs, JSES, 2004

q    25 patients

q    At 14 months post-op, all had improvement in pain, passive ROM, Constant score and SF-36

n    Diwan, Arthroscopy, 2005

q    40 patients, 2 year f/u

q    Standard anterior release vs extended release

q    The extended release with supervised post-op PT program produced greater and lasting gains

Open Release

n    Omari, JSES, 2001

q    25 patients treated with open surgical release

q    20 months f/u

q    Results: 20 G/E, 3 Fair, 2 Poor

n      1 IDDM

n      1 bilateral Dupuytrens

q    Results more favorable in non-diabetics

The Future?

n    Clinical trial being undertaken in NY to evaluate use of collagenase injected intra-articularly

What do we know?

n    Most interventions produce short-term improvements in symptoms

n    Some interventions produce short-term improvements in function

n    All patients have long-term improvement in pain and function regardless of intervention

Home Exercises

n     Simple exercise program

n     No special equipment

n     Can do anywhere

Posterior Capsular Stretches

Shoulder Manipulation

n     Described technique of manipulation without rotation based on Codman’s paradox

n     76 sequential manipulations with improvement in ROM and without fracture or other complication

Arthroscopic Release

n     Release is performed at the glenoid side of the capsule

q     Minimizes risk to nerve

n     Technique requires changing portals to complete release

n     Can do selective release and check motion

Open Release

n     Anterior deltopectoral approach allows debridement of subdeltoid space

Open Release

n     Subscapularis contracture can be treated by intrasubstance Z-lengthening of tendon and capsule

Open Release

n     Subscapularis mobilization when muscle is adherent to capsule

Principles of Treatment

n    In Phase 1, treatment goal is palliative

q    Do not operate

q    Physical Therapy with aggressive stretching may be counter productive

n    Secondary Adhesive Capsulitis is less likely to respond to conservative measures

q    Low threshold for return to OR

n    Physical exam can help determine extent of release needed

Principles of Treatment

n    Arthroscopic release can address entire capsule, rotator interval, subdeltoid space

n    Release close to glenoid to minimize risk to cuff tendons and axillary nerve

n    Positioning in beach chair allows easy conversion to open procedure

 

Case #1

n      10/04, taken to OR for MUA, Arthroscopic 360º capsular release

q     ROM EUA

n      Flex 90

n      Abd 60

n      ER 0/90 10/30

n      IR 0/90 40/0

q     ROM post-op

n      Flex 170

n      Abd 120

n      ER 0/90 90/100

n      IR 0/90 NR/60

q     ROM 4 months, Occasional functional and night pain

n      Flex 160

n      Abd 160

n      ER 0/90 40/50

n      IR L2

Case #2

n      2/05, taken to OR for MUA, Arthroscopic 360º capsular release

q     ROM EUA

n      Elev 110

n      Abd 90

n      ER 0/90 30/30

n      IR 0/90 30/20

Case #2

q     ROM post-op

n      Elev 150

n      Abd 120

n      ER 0/90 80/90

n      IR 0/90 NR/70

q     ROM 4 months, Minimal functional pain

n      Elev 145

n      Abd 110

n      ER 0/90 35/NR

n      IR Buttock